In the instance of a human body in modern civilization who is employed 40 hours a week: half or sometimes more than half (factoring in commute and overtime) of this human’s waking life is spent to collect a paycheck so they can support the survival of OTHER human bodies in modern civilization. One may make the false assumption they are employed in an occupation in order to support themselves but in truth, they do NOT: they financially support every human body who charges them money.

It’s doubly worse when the person works in an essential occupation AND has financial expenses: the employed person is not only ensuring the physical survival of other human bodies by providing essential products and/or services, they are also monetarily supporting other human bodies’ living existence.

An example of exploitation: someone who works in an essential occupation that pays minimum wage, say $10 an hour (after tax deductions) and this person would like to go on vacation, but accommodations cost $100 a night. This essential worker has to ask themselves if spending 10 hours of their life at work (and sometimes in an occupation they loathe) is worth 1 night in a vacation rental. It’s all the worse if this person does not even own their home yet foolishly spends money on lodgings while on vacation and consequentially, on other humans.

The monetary system is in place to ensure the survival of a lot of useless, non-essential humans in modern civilization.

“Useless Eaters” are NOT the elderly or disabled: they are the socio-economically ENABLED. True “useless eaters” are the parasitic human bodies in modern industrialized civilization who have been able to acquire a considerable amount of money by siphoning from the legitimate earnings of honest working, essential laboring people.

True “useless eaters” are also the vampiric human bodies in modern civilization who have been able to obtain a monetary livelihood by being “employed” in non-essential, sham occupations.

Immoral, parasitic people are also those who expect, attempt, or who succeed in getting others to pay for their human-bodied children, and AGAINST that individual’s WILL.

Politicians who advocate for human population growth do it only to become popular amongst the masses and hence, gain votes. Such politicians pander to the unenlightened masses to secure more political power for themselves and ultimately, acquire increased incomes to support their greedy, material wants in modern civilization. Any politician advancing a “child tax credit” is a true monster to the environment and to citizens who have no human-bodied children. A child/family related policy implemented by the government should be the exact opposite: it should be a severe penalty, a child TAX, upon human parents who birth more than one life dependent upon modern civilization.

To reiterate, human population growth is NOT environmentally friendly nor economically sustainable nor ecologically viable.

I have previously pointed out that monetary wealth accumulates at the top of the capitalistic pyramid structure but it also, in some cases, is redistributed amongst the masses. Whether it’s the few “idle rich” or too many of the masses in modern civilization striving for a more affluent lifestyle, both socio-economic castes have the most harmful ecological impact on Planet Earth.

When the cost of living goes up (be it utilities, housing, interest charged, or consumer products becoming more expensive), there is one or more of the following causes:

• an increase of immigrants and migrants in developed, “first world” nations (i.e., modern industrialized civilization)

• more human babies being born in modern civilization

• more human bodies in modern civilization acquiring more expensive lifestyles

• CEOs and other business people at the top of the food chain are pocketing more profits for themselves; how that money is eventually spent and where it goes, who knows?

***

Every human body that would charge or who would otherwise take money from you, especially when they don’t have a true need for it, is your ENEMY.

Every human body that would charge or who would otherwise take money from you, when your income is considerably less than theirs and you are not the legal owner of your home, is truly EVIL.

***

The idea of a rent and mortgage strike as an act of civil disobedience first occurred to me in the year 2000. The inspiration for this was the exploitation and hardship my more distant European ancestors suffered as peasants and serfs during the feudal system in medieval Europe.

The tactic of a rent and mortgage strike, particularly in regions which are forested, is to also be applied for the purpose of forest protection. My impression is that humans who reside and work in rural to remote regions and who are dependent upon the monetary system to get their material needs met, their first and foremost expense is on land and housing.

Why can’t every human in a county/parish, designated region, or state/province refuse to pay their mortgage and rent? There wouldn’t be an economic collapse and that many people in solidarity (for example, an entire state or province) cannot be forcibly removed from their homes.

Old-growth forest is irreplaceable. The true value of the forest is in its living, healthy, and intact state. Rural people, especially those who are indigenous to the region, should NOT be forced into the resource extraction business and NOT ever to obtain money for housing. It is outrageous that country/rural people, be they aboriginal or not, should feel compelled to destroy their local environment to acquire money to financially & materially support OTHER people and BAD people at that.

A tenant pays their landlord’s mortgage…
A “homeowner” pays off their home loan to the bank…
And who, ultimately, is financially benefiting from this egregiously immoral, unfair, and exploitative process?

And who is consuming most of the pulp, paper, and lumber products derived from Canadian forests? Not First Nations people and not Canadians.

Traditional indigenous people and those of descent have moral, territorial, and ancestral rights to their forests; the resource extraction industries and non-indigenous consumers do NOT.

Copyright © October 21st, 2021 and 2022 Y.F.S. All Rights Reserved.

No part of this document/digital content may be reproduced or retransmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the author, whose pen name/initials have been provided herein. Any selling, trading, unauthorized alteration, plagiarism, spiritual or intellectual property theft of this document/digital content; identity theft or any other transgression/violation of the person/author/human body referenced herein, is strictly prohibited.